Áttekintés a nem szó szerinti jelentések megértése során aktiválódó agyterületekről ALE-metaanalízis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Absztrakt
Jelen tanulmány célja a pragmatikai megértés neurális hátterének feltérképezése. Ehhez egy, a nemzetközi szakirodalomban jól ismert módszert, az ALE (activation likelihood estimation) metaanalízist alkalmaztam. A tanulmányok szűrése és válogatása után 63 tanulmányt elemeztem. A vizsgált pragmatikai jelenségek a metafora, metonímia, irónia, szarkazmus, implikatúrák, beszédaktusok, idiómák és szólások voltak. A metaanalízis 1204 résztvevő adataiból készült. 590 aktivációs gócot azonosítottam a figuratív > szó szerinti megértés kontrasztjára. Az azonosított aktivációs gócok egy része az agynak egyrészt valamely strukturális csomópontja, mint a precuneus, a superior frontális gyrus, a superior parietális lebeny, az insula, a hippocampus vagy a thalamus. Másrészt az azonosított területek között agyi funkcionális hálózatok (mint pl. a nyelvi vagy a tudatelméleti hálózat) csomópontjait is megtaláljuk, mint bilaterálisan a precuneus, a frontális lebeny laterális és mediális gyrusai, a temporális lebeny superior és középső gyrusai, az amygdala; valamint a bal inferior és superior parietális lebeny, az insula és a cinguláris kéreg.
Letöltések
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hivatkozások
Ackeren, Markus J. van – Daniel Casasanto – Harold Bekkering – Peter Hagoort – Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer 2012. Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24/11:2237–2247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00274
Ackeren, Markus J. van – Areti Smaragdi – Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer 2016. Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11/9:1402–1410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw062
Ahrens, Kathleen – Ho-Ling Liu – Chia-Ying Lee – Shu-Ping Gong – Shin-Yi Fang – Yuan-Yu Hsu 2007. Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language 100/2:163–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004
Akimoto, Yoritaka – Motoaki Sugiura – Yukihito Yomogida – Carlos Makoto Miyauchi – Shiho Miyazawa – Ryuta Kawashima 2014. Irony comprehension: Social conceptual knowledge and emotional response. Human Brain Mapping 35/4:1167–1178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22242
Bambini, Valentina – Claudio Gentili – Emiliano Ricciardi – Pier Marco Bertinetto – Pietro Pietrini 2011. Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Bulletin 86/3–4:203–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.015
Bašnáková, Jana – Kirsten Weber – Karl Magnus Petersson – Jos van Berkum – Peter Hagoort 2014. Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex 24/10:2572–2578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht112
Beaty, Roger E. – Paul J. Silvia – Mathias Benedek 2017. Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition 111:163–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004
Bendersky, Mariana – Carolina Lomlomdjian – Valeria Abusamra – Bautista Elizalde Acevedo – Silvia Kochen – Lucía Alba-Ferrara 2021. Functional anatomy of idiomatic expressions. Brain Topography 34/4:489–503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-021-00843-3
Benedek, Mathias – Roger Beaty – Emanuel Jauk – Karl Koschutnig – Andreas Fink – Paul J. Silvia – Beate Dunst – Aljoscha C. Neubauer 2014. Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage 90:99–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046
Bohrn, Isabel C. – Ulrike Altmann – Arthur M. Jacobs 2012. Looking at the brains behind figurative language: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia 50/11:2669–2683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
Bosco, Francesca M. – Alberto Parola – Maria C. Valentini – Rosalba Morese 2017. Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions. Cortex 94:73–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.010
Boulenger, Véronique – Olaf Hauk – Friedmann Pulvermuller 2009. Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 19/8:1905–1914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn217
Chen, Evan – Page Widick – Anjan Chatterjee 2008. Functional–anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain and Language 107/3:194–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.007
Citron, Francesca M. M. – Cristina Cacciari – Jakob M. Funcke – Chun-Ting Hsu – Arthur M. Jacobs 2019. Idiomatic expressions evoke stronger emotional responses in the brain than literal sentences. Neuropsychologia 131:233–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020
Citron, Francesca M. M. – Adele E. Goldberg 2014. Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26/11:2585–2595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654
Citron, Francesca M. M. – Jeremie Güsten – Nora Michaelis – Adele E. Goldberg 2016. Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. NeuroImage 139:218–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020
Collins, D. Louis – Peter Neelin – Terrence M. Peters – Alan C. Evans 1994. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 18/2:192.
Desai, Rutvik H. – Lisa L. Conant – Jeffrey R. Binder – Haeil Park – Mark S. Seidenberg 2013. A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage 83:862–869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044
Diaz, Michele T. – Kyle T. Barrett – Larson J. Hogstrom 2011. The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity. Neuropsychologia 49/3:320–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.004
Diaz, Michele T. – Larson J. Hogstrom 2011. The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23/11:3586–3597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00053
Eickhoff, Simon B. – Angela R. Laird – P. Mickle Fox – Jack L. Lancaster – Peter T. Fox 2017. Implementation errors in the GingerALE Software: Description and recommendations. Human Brain Mapping 38/1:7–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23342
Eickhoff, Simon B. – Angela R. Laird – Christian Grefkes – Ling E. Wang – Karl Zilles – Peter T. Fox 2009. Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping 30/9:2907–2926. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20718
Farkas, Andrew H. – Rebekah L. Trotti – Elizabeth A. Edge – Ling-Yu Huang – Aviva Kasowski – Olivia F. Thomas – Eli Chlan – Maria P. Granros – Kajol K. Patel – Dean Sabatinelli 2021. Humor and emotion: Quantitative meta analyses of functional neuroimaging studies. Cortex 139:60–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.023
Feng, Wangshu – Yue Wu – Catherine Jan – Hongbo Yu – Xiaoming Jiang – Xiaolin Zhou 2017. Effects of contextual relevance on pragmatic inference during conversation: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 171:52–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.04.005
Ferstl, Evelyn C. – Jane Neumann – Carsten Bogler – D. Yves Von Cramon 2008. The extended language network: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29/5:581–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20422
Filik, Ruth – Alexandra Ţurcan – Christina Ralph-Nearman – Alain Pitiot 2019. What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study. Cortex 115:112–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.025
Forgács, Bálint – Isabel Bohrn – Jürgen Baudewig – Markus J. Hofmann – Csaba Pléh – Arthur M. Jacobs 2012. Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. NeuroImage 63/3:1432–1442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029
Gaudet, Isabelle – Alejandra Hüsser – Phetsamone Vannasing – Anne Gallagher 2020. Functional brain connectivity of language functions in children revealed by EEG and MEG: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:62. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00062
Giora, Rachel 2003. On Our Mind. Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartung, Franziska – Yoed N. Kenett – Eileen R. Cardillo – Stacey Humphries – Nathaniel Klooster – Anjan Chatterjee 2020. Context matters: Novel metaphors in supportive and non-supportive contexts. NeuroImage 212:116645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116645
Hauptman, Miriam – Idan Blank – Evelina Fedorenko 2023. Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach. Cortex 162:96–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.013
Hornick, Shiri – Einat Shetreet 2022. Pragmatic inferences: Neuroimaging of ad-hoc implicatures. Journal of Neurolinguistics 64:101090. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101090
Jang, Gijeong – Shin-ae Yoon – Sung-Eun Lee – Haeil Park – Joohan Kim – Jeong Hoon Ko – Hae-Jeong Park 2013. Everyday conversation requires cognitive inference: Neural bases of comprehending implicated meanings in conversations. NeuroImage 81:61–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.027
Kana, Rajesh K. – Donna L. Murdaugh – Kelly R. Wolfe – Sandhya L. Kumar 2012. Brain responses mediating idiom comprehension: Gender and hemispheric differences. Brain Research 1467:18–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.031
Kövecses, Zoltán 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Kuperberg, Rita – Philip McGuire – Edward T. Bullmore – M. J. Brammer – S. Rabe-Hesketh – I. C. Wright – D. J. Lythgoe – S. C. R. Williams – A. S. David 2000. Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12/2:321–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562138
Kutas Mária 2014. A szó szerinti és a képes nyelv feldolgozása mint emberi agyi funkció. In Pléh Csaba – Lukács Ágnes (szerk.) Pszicholingvisztika. Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv. Vol. 2 Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 1135–1166.
Lacey, Simon – Randall Stilla – K. Sathian 2012. Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language 120/3:416–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.016
Laird, Angela R. – Simon B. Eickhoff – Florian Kurth – Peter M. Fox – Angela M. Uecker – Jessica A. Turner – Jennifer L. Robinson – Jack L. Lancaster – Peter T. Fox 2009. ALE meta-analysis workflows via the BrainMap database: Progress towards a probabilistic functional brain atlas. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 3:23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.023.2009
Lee, Susan S. – Mirella Dapretto 2006. Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage 29/2:536–544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003
Licea-Haquet, Giovanna L. – Azalea Reyes-Aguilar – Sarael Alcauter – Magda Giordano 2021. The neural substrate of speech act recognition. Neuroscience 471:102–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.07.020
Li, Sai – Xiaoming Jiang – Hongbo Yu – Xiaolin Zhou 2014. Cognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9/8:1166–1174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst091
Litwińczuk, Marta Czime – Nils Muhlert – Lauren Cloutman – Nelson Trujillo-Barreto – Anna Woollams 2022. Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function. NeuroImage 262:119531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119531
Liu, Di – Lei Hao – Lei Han – Ying Zhou – Shaozheng Qin – Kazuhisa Niki – Wangbing Shen – Baoguo Shi – Jing Luo 2023. The optimal balance of controlled and spontaneous processing in insight problem solving: fMRI evidence from Chinese idiom guessing. Psychophysiology 60/7:e14240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14240
Mashal, Nira – Miriam Faust – Talma Hendler – Mark Jung-Beeman 2007. An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language 100/2:115–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.005
Mashal, Nira – Miriam Faust – Talma Hendler – Mark Jung-Beeman 2009. An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 14/1:30–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802049433
Müller, Veronika I. – Edna C. Cieslik – Angela R. Laird – Peter T. Fox – Joaquim Radua et al. 2018. Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 84:151–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.012
Nagels, Arne – Christina Kauschke – Judith Schrauf – Carin Whitney – Benjamin Straube – Tilo Kircher 2013. Neural substrates of figurative language during natural speech perception: an fMRI study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00121
Obert, Alexandre – Fabien Gierski – Arnaud Calmus – Aurélie Flucher – Christophe Portefaix – Laurent Pierot – Arthur Kaladjian – Stéphanie Caillies 2016. Neural correlates of contrast and humor: Processing common features of verbal irony. PLOS ONE 11/11:e0166704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166704
Obert, Alexandre – Fabien Gierski – Arnaud Calmus – Christophe Portefaix – Christelle Declercq – Laurent Pierot – Stéphanie Caillies 2014. Differential bilateral involvement of the parietal gyrus during predicative metaphor processing: An auditory fMRI study. Brain and Language 137:112–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.002
Oldham, Stuart – Alex Fornito 2019. The development of brain network hubs. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 36:100607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.005
Olm, Christopher A. – Corey T. McMillan – Nicola Spotorno – Robin Clark – Murray Grossman 2014. The relative contributions of frontal and parietal cortex for generalized quantifier comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00610
Pléh Csaba 2000. A modularitás és pragmatika: Néhány egyszerű és bonyolult kapcsolat. Erdélyi Pszichológiai Szemle 1/4:9–30.
Pléh Csaba 2007. A tér és a nyelv világa. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 62/3:279–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1556/mpszle.62.2007.3.1
Pléh Csaba 2020. Pragmatika és pszicholingvisztika összekapcsolódásának változatai. Magyar Nyelvőr 144/1:86–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.38143/Nyr.2020.1.86
Pomp, Jennifer – Anne-Kathrin Bestgen – Patrick Schulze – Christina J. Müller – Francesca M. M. Citron – Boris Suchan – Lars Kuchinke 2018. Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts. Brain and Language 179:11–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.001
Powell, Joanne L. – Joe Furlong – Christophe E. de Bézenac – Noreen O’Sullivan – Rhiannon Corcoran 2019. The pragmatics of pragmatic language and the curse of ambiguity: An fMRI study. Neuroscience 418:96–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.039
Prat, Chantel S. – Robert A. Mason – Marcel Adam Just 2012. An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: The influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38/2:282–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026037
Rapp, Alexander M. – Michael Erb – Wolfgang Grodd – Mathias Bartels – Katja Markert 2011. Neural correlates of metonymy resolution. Brain and Language 119/3:196–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.004
Rapp, Alexander M. – Dirk T. Leube – Michael Erb – Wolfgang Grodd – Tilo T. J. Kircher 2004. Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research 20/3:395–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.017
Rapp, Alexander M. – Dorothee E. Mutschler – Michael Erb 2012. Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage 63/1:600–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022
Rapp, Alexander M. – Dorothee E. Mutschler – Barbara Wild – Michael Erb – I. Lengsfeld – Ralf Saur – Wolfgang Grodd 2010. Neural correlates of irony comprehension: The role of schizotypal personality traits. Brain and Language 113/1:1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.11.007
Reyes-Aguilar, Azalea – Elizabeth Valles-Capetillo – Magda Giordano 2018. A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of pragmatic language comprehension: In search of a universal neural substrate. Neuroscience 395:60–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.043
Romero Lauro, Leonor J. – Giulia Mattavelli – Costanza Papagno – Marco Tettamanti 2013. She runs, the road runs, my mind runs, bad blood runs between us: Literal and figurative motion verbs: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 83:361–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.050
Romero Lauro, Leonor J. – Marco Tettamanti – Stefano F. Cappa – Costanza Papagno 2008. Idiom comprehension: A prefrontal task? Cerebral Cortex 18/1:162–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm042
Samur, Dalya – Vicky T. Lai – Peter Hagoort – Roel M. Willems 2015. Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia 78:108–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.003
Schmidt, Gwenda L. – Carol A. Seger 2009. Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition 71/3:375–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001
Schnell, Zsuzsanna 2024. Rethinking linguistic relativity in idiomaticity: Conceptual universals and frames of reference in pragmatic competence. In Judit Baranyiné Kóczy – Veronika Jávor-Szelid (szerk.) Proceedings of the Third Cultural Linguistics International Conference in June 2021. Past in Present: Metaphor and Reconceptualized Tradition. Singapore: Springer. megjelenés alatt.
Shetreet, Einat – Gennaro Chierchia – Nadine Gaab 2014. When some is not every: Dissociating scalar implicature generation and mismatch. Human Brain Mapping 35/4:1503–1514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22269
Shibata, Midori – Jun-ichi Abe – Hiroaki Itoh – Koji Shimada – Satoshi Umeda 2011. Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task. Neuropsychologia 49/13:3542–3550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006
Shibata, Midori – Jun-ichi Abe – Atsushi Terao – Tamaki Miyamoto 2007. Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research 1166:92–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040
Shibata, Midori – Akira Toyomura – Hiroaki Itoh – Jun-ichi Abe 2010. Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study. Brain Research 1308:114–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.030
Shibata, Midori – Akira Toyomura – Hiroki Motoyama – Hiroaki Itoh – Yasuhiro Kawabata – Jun-ichi Abe 2012. Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study. Brain and Language 121/3:254–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.006
Spotorno, Nicola – Eric Koun – Jérôme Prado – Jean-Baptiste van der Henst – Ira A. Noveck 2012. Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. NeuroImage 63/1:25–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.046
Stringaris, Argyris K. – Nicholas C. Medford – Vincent Giampietro – Michael J. Brammer – Anthony S. David 2007. Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences. Brain and Language 100/2:150–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.001
Stringaris, Argyris K. – Nicholas Medford – Rachel Giora – Vincent C. Giampietro – Michael J. Brammer – Anthony S. David 2006. How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex. NeuroImage 33/2:784–793. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.057
Subramaniam, Karuna – Mark Beeman – Miriam Faust – Nira Mashal 2013. Positively valenced stimuli facilitate creative novel metaphoric processes by enhancing medial prefrontal cortical activation. Frontiers in Psychology 4:211. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00211
Talairach, Jean – Pierre Tournoux 1988. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Thieme.
Uchiyama, Hitoshi – Ayumi Seki – Hiroko Kageyama – Daisuke N. Saito – Tatsuya Koeda – Kousaku Ohno – Norihiro Sadato 2006. Neural substrates of sarcasm: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Brain Research 1124/1:100–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.088
Uddin, Lucina Q. – Kaustubh S. Supekar – Srikanth Ryali – Vinod Menon 2011. Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. The Journal of Neuroscience 31/50:18578–18589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011
Valles-Capetillo, Elizabeth – Cristian D. Ibarra – Magda Giordano 2023. Irony detection engages the Precuneus and Inferior Frontal Gyrus and relies on integration of contextual cues and inferential skills. Preprint. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.15.504018
Vartanian, Oshin 2012. Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: Implications for the neuroscience of creativity. British Journal of Psychology 103/3:302–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02073.x
Vrticka, Pascal – Jessica M. Black – Allan L. Reiss 2013. The neural basis of humour processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14/12:860–868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3566
Wakusawa, Keisuke – Motoaki Sugiura – Yuko Sassa – Hyeonjeong Jeong – Kaoru Horie – Shigeru Sato – Hiroyuki Yokoyama – Shigeru Tsuchiya – Kazuie Inuma – Ryuta Kawashima 2007. Comprehension of implicit meanings in social situations involving irony: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage 37/4:1417–1426. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.013
Wallentin, Mikkel – Svend Østergaard – Torben Ellegaard Lund – Leif Østergaard – Andreas Roepstorff 2005. Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain and Language 92/3:221–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.106
Yang, Jie 2014. The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 35/1:107–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22160
Yang, Jie – Ping Li – Xiaoping Fang – Hua Shu – Youyi Liu – Lang Chen 2016. Hemispheric involvement in the processing of Chinese idioms: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 87:12–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.029
Yang, Jie – Hua Shu 2016. Involvement of the motor system in comprehension of non-literal action language: A meta-analysis study. Brain Topography 29/1:94–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-015-0427-5
Yang, XiaoHong – HuiJie Li – Nan Lin – XiuPing Zhang – YinShan Wang – Ying Zhang – Qian Zhang – XiNian Zuo – YuFang Yang 2019. Uncovering cortical activations of discourse comprehension and their overlaps with common large-scale neural networks. NeuroImage 203:116200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116200
Yi, You Gyoung – Dae Yul Kim – Woo Hyun Shim – Joo Young Oh – Sung Hyun Kim – Ho Sung Kim 2017. Neural correlates of Korean proverb processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain and Behavior 7/10:e00829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.829
Yu, Fei – Jianxin Zhang – Jin Fan – Jing Luo – Wencai Zhang 2019. Hippocampus and amygdala: An insight-related network involved in metaphorical solution to mental distress problem. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 19/4:1022–1035. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00702-6
Zempleni, Monika-Zita – Marco Haverkort – Remco Renken – Laurie A. Stowe 2007. Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 34/3:1280–1291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.049